Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Keeping Up with the White House Book Club

First it was Camus. The NYT reported last August that President Bush was reading The Stranger on his month-long vacation at the ranch. Hmmm, wouldn’t it be better as a beach novel? It’s plausible, if far-fetched, to think he actually read it for an afternoon’s relaxation. As millions of college students know, it’s a mercifully thin book, almost a quick read. I figured the President’s favorite passage was the action climax where Meursaul guns down the Arab on the rocks. If he read Dick Cheney’s loaner copy, he might have gone right to the dog-eared page, skipping all the jail cell meditation about the meaning of existence.

Then it was A Savage War of Peace, the classic account of the French debacle in Algeria. In a 60 Minutes interview in January, the President claimed to be reading this tome, along with half the colonels in the Pentagon. Judging from the unremitting Bush debacle in Iraq, that claim sounds a little like jumping the shark. After that primetime plug, author Alistair Horne gave crusty interviews to Chris Lydon on Open Source and Maureen Dowd in the NYT (sorry, this one is behind the pay wall; Smirking Chimp has a bootleg).

Lydon asked what the historian’s advice would be for Tony Blair. “I don’t want to be excessively rude about my Prime Minister,” the octogenarian answered, “but I’d say he’s a man of small stature who is impressed by important people and likes going to the White House. His input, it seems to me, is absolutely nil, and he’s got nothing back.”

Dowd asked Horne what the president could learn from his book. ''The depressing problem of getting entangled in the Muslim world,'' he replied. ''Algeria was a thoroughly bloodthirsty war that ended horribly and cost the lives of about 20,000 Frenchmen and a million Algerians. There was a terrible civil war. De Gaulle ended up giving literally everything away and left without his pants.''

If Bush is reading Dick Cheney’s or Karl Rove’s loaner copy, Savage War’s insights about torture have probably been redacted with a black highlighter pen. Let’s hope he didn’t go straight to the heavily dog-eared chapter about the French Army’s plan to invade Paris from Algeria, the threatened right-wing coup that returned Charles de Gaulle to power in 1958. Reading history is a good thing, Mr. President, but don’t get any more wing-nut ideas about the grandeur of presidential power.

Now the White House Book Club is buzzing about King Leopold’s Ghost, a history of Belgium’s colonial misdeeds in the Congo. This week’s On the Media features an interview with author Adam Hochschild, who says Belgian King Leopold was a media spin-meister of “Karl Rovian proportions.” Haven’t read that one yet. I’ll never catch up.

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

“Into each life some rain must fall…”

Today is the 200th birthday of Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, scion of poets everywhere with three-part names. In the 19th century you couldn’t get a union card in the Literary Lions Guild without a name scanned in iambic pentameter. Think Ralph Waldo Emerson, John Greenleaf Whittier, Paul Laurence Dunbar, and Sarah Orne Jewett. The most perfectly metered, onomatopoeic name actually had four parts: Edna St. Vincent Millay. How’s that for burning the candle on both ends?

To celebrate, the HWL bicentennial committee sent snippets of weather-drenched verse to 1,800 meteorologists around the country. The Longfellow Poetry Forecast includes old chestnuts like “Into each life some rain must fall/Some days must be dark and dreary.” And there are more obscure couplets like “She heard the birds sing, she saw the sun shine,/The air of summer was sweeter than wine.” Beware callow youth who try to couple with that line.

Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill

Forget the war drums for a moment. Forget the treachery of icy sidewalks. Imagine seeing one of these guys at your bird feeder. Mark Twain said, “The coldest winter I ever spent was a summer in San Francisco,” but that was a century before a flock of wild parrots took up residence on Telegraph Hill. Now there is a book and a documentary film telling the parrot story. An NPR piece summarizes it, and YouTube has a clip of the movie trailer.

Monday, February 26, 2007

Banging the War Drum #4

Open Source » Blog Archive » Iran: Another War Dance? 022007
to Iran Bush war_drums RadioOpenSource z07_02
Juan Cole says Dick Cheney is the worst war-monger in American history. Other guests included Jonathan Landay, one of the few journalists to question the war drums in 2003; Trita Parsi, president, National Iranian American Council; and Sam Gardiner, whose war-drum analysis prevented sleep a couple weeks ago. Much of the talk centered around the BBC News story earlier on 022007 about the U.S. target list for Iran. Gardiner says the fact that stories like that are getting leaked means there are some worried people in the CIA and Pentagon.

BBC NEWS | Middle East | US 'Iran attack plans' revealed 022007
to Iran war_drums Bush politics BBC z07_02 ... saved by 57 other people

Remember Al Qaeda? They're baaack - Los Angeles Times 022007
Op-ed by Bruce Hoffman
to 9/11 terrorism fear Bush politics Afghanistan Iraq z07_0

Terror Officials See Al Qaeda Chiefs Regaining Power - New York Times 021807
By MARK MAZZETTI and DAVID ROHDE
to 9/11 terrorism fear Afghanistan Iraq NYT z07_02 ... 4 days ago

On Point : Al Qaeda Ascending - Al Qaeda Ascending 021907
to 9/11 terrorism fear Iraq NPR z07_02
Guests include
Mark Mazzetti and Bruce Hoffman.

Sunday, February 25, 2007

An Experiment in Link Blogging

These are copied from del.icio.us/willis.creative/war_drums.

Sic Semper Tyrannis 2007: A Phased UK Withdrawal 022207
Guest analysis by Wayne White. UK pullout of Bosra will threaten US-Kuwait supply lines and pathway for exit strategy.
to Iraq Bush politics war_drums z07_02 ... saved by 1 other person ... 22 hours ago

Sic Semper Tyrannis 2007: Bureaucracy's Cost 022107
Pat Lang on the scandal at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Talk about supporting the troops...
to Iraq Bush politics war_drums z07_02 ... 22 hours ago

How to Leave a Comment

I want to read your comments about 2deepgeek, unless you are a spam robot or its human facsimile. This Blogger template (it’s called Tekka) has an obscure user interface for comments. It isn’t as inviting as I would like, but it’s shown me what to look for in the next blog platform.

Here’s how it works.

1. Look for the line at the bottom of the post that begins with “Posted by…”.

2. Click the link “0comments”. That’s your invitation to make it “>0comments”.

3. That click takes you to the post’s comment page, where you can add your response in a text field on the right side of the page.

4. Don’t forget to hit the “publish” button. You’re good to go. Thanks!

A Stroll in the Gallery: Francesca von Habsburg



Francesca von Habsburg NT 022507/print

In case, at this point, you are inclined to dismiss her spendthrift passion as the grande folie of a rich heiress, it’s worth remembering another art-crazy heiress who after half a lifetime of not amounting to much developed a passion for avant-garde art and bought it out of a sense of public service to the artists who made it. In Peggy Guggenheim’s case, they were Braque, Picasso and Ernst.
Another art-crazy heiress comes to mind: Helen Birch Bartlett. She lived/died and spent her daddy’s fortune along the way two decades before Peggy Guggenheim hit the scene. Helen was collecting/exhibiting modernist art before there was a Guggenheim Museum or MOMA. She induced/endowed the Art Institute of Chicago to open its first gallery of modernist paintings (hers, of course) in the 1920s. You can see them today in the Helen Birch Bartlett Memorial Collection on the second floor – Seurat, Van Gogh, Picasso, and more. People in Yellow Springs know her for a different reason. She was the sensitive young girl who wrote poems beneath an oak tree overlooking the Cascades. Daddy bought the place and made it a nature preserve called Glen Helen.



A Stroll in the Gallery: Helen Birch Bartlett

Photo source: Art Institute of Chicago

Frederic Clay and Helen Birch Bartlett, c. 1923. Photograph
courtesy of Libby Bartlett Sturges.

See the Helen Birch Bartlett Memorial Collection at the Art Institute of Chicago.

Pole-Dancing Parties Catch on in Book Club Country

From the headline I expected this NYT article to reveal a new spin on the nerdy book nook crowd. Consider this: “She wrapped herself around the pole in intriguing ways, then flowed onto the floor like fast honey.” That’s not exactly Wuthering Heights. Oh, Heathcliff!

But the piece reads more like The Theory of the Leisure Class than The Story of O:

Now the pole — think ballet barre turned vertical — is the new star at racier versions of Tupperware parties in well-heeled (if high-heeled) areas like this one in the northwest hills of Morris County, about 33 miles from Manhattan. Billed as “femme empowerment,” such at-home pole dancing lessons are taking place in the realm of book clubs, with mothers — and grandmothers — learning slinky moves for girls’ nights in, bachelorette send-offs, even the occasional 60th birthday celebration.

More on that Great American Folk Dance.

NOTE TO POLE-DANCERS (and CALAMARI LOVERS) EVERYWHERE: Settings are fixed and Comments are On. Still not easy to use in this blog template. Click on 0 Comments at the bottom of the post. It’s lonely musing/ranting all by myself.

BOOK NOOK BONUS: The NYT story quotes the authors of Striptease: The Untold History of the Girlie Show and Better Than I Ever Expected: Straight Talk About Sex After Sixty.

Saturday, February 24, 2007

Calm Down, Calamari Lovers

The 990-pound colossal squid hauled out of the icy waters of the Ross Sea on Thursday will not be sliced and grilled to order. It will be preserved for science. It’s the largest invertebrate animal ever found.

According to the Timaru Herald in New Zealand, “The squid is being stored at Sanfords in Timaru before being transferred to Te Papa in Wellington to be preserved for scientific study. It will be photographed, measured, tissue sampled, registered and preserved intact for the National Environment collection.”

The colossal squid (Mesonychoteuthis hamiltoni) grows up to 14 meters in length. It has the largest eyes in the animal kingdom. Known from only a handful of intact specimens, most evidence of this species’ existence comes from the stomachs of sperm whales.

The colossal squid is even bigger than the better-known giant squid (Architeuthis), which was inspiration for the kraken of Norse legend and the truculent sea monster in Jules Verne’s 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (this image comes from the book’s first edition courtesy Wikipedia Commons).

BONUS FOR CALAMARI LOVERS: Bruce Schneier’s blog (Schneier on Security) has a weekly feature called Friday Squid Blogging. That led me to this Flickr pix of Softie Couture.

Friday, February 23, 2007

See Mud? It’s Eric Dolphy Day!


Do they still celebrate Eric Dolphy in Syracuse, New York? Back in the 70s friends of mine at LeMoyne College cut classes and partied on the first winter day when enough snow melted so they could see mud again. They proclaimed this earliest harbinger of spring to be Eric Dolphy Day.

Listen to this YouTube clip of Eric’s solo performance of God Bless the Child and you’ll understand why. That bass clarinet sounds chthonic. Makes me want to wallow with the toads in some primordial ooze. Maybe by my back door. Get down, batrachians!

It isn’t exactly mud-luscious and puddle-wonderful yet, as e e cummings put it. But there’s enough moist, bare earth under foot to summon Eric’s spirit.

This is the debut of a weekly series of jazz clips that I’ll call CafĂ© Mouffe. Why the name? Tune in next Friday and I’ll explain.

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Spinoza’s Anger Management Class

MEDIA NOTES: Spinoza: Mind of the Modern, Open Source 021407

I tried to read Spinoza in my youth and didn’t get very far. So I was dubious about a radio talk show devoted to the 17th-century philosopher. And it was Open Source’s Valentine edition. That’s 2deepgeek for sure. But to quote Spinoza the humanist: “Let all men think what they want and say what they think.”

One of the show’s guests was neuroscientist Antonio Damasio, who is widely known for his work on the biology of emotion. He considers Spinoza to be a “proto-biologist”. Damasio explained something in Spinoza’s thought that is so profound it should be obvious. Spinoza said something like this: “An affect cannot be restrained or neutralized except by a contrary affect that is stronger than the affect to be restrained.” Damasio paraphrases it thus: “If you want to overpower an emotion that’s driving you in the wrong direction, that is a passion, in fact, the only way you can do that is not by saying no, but by saying no through another emotion that is more powerful than the previous one.”

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Ash Wednesday: Don’t Give Up NOLA for Lent

News Orleans needs our attention after the party, too. I’m still working my way through some thoughtful media coverage in the run up to Mardi Gras.

Harry Shearer’s LeShow [021807] featured a two-part interview about Post-Katrina New Orleans with Times-Picayune columnist Lolis Eric Elie. You can download streams of Part I and Part II .

Elie published an op-ed in the 021107 Washington Post: Unmasking Our Pain in New Orleans.

Open Source [021907] devoted a show to Katrina and the Insurance Tsunami. Heavy hitters like Lloyds of London and Swiss Re are pulling out of the coastal real estate re-insurance biz. After Katrina, they got religion about global warming. Is it actuarial hard-heartedness or prphetic market timing?

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Mardi Gras: Smokin’ with Some Barbecue!

I’ll miss the Zulu and Rex parades. I won’t hassle with the drunken mob on Bourbon Street. But I can listen to Kermit Ruffins! I have some beads, a fine Cuban cigar, and spicy andouile sausage from Farmer Dale. I excavated a snow pit for my grill. So, bluntly speaking, I’ll be smokin’ with some barbecue tonight. Happy Mardi Gras, y’all.

FOR THE FEED (which doesn’t carry the enclosure at the top of the post): Check out the YouTube clip of Kermit singing Smokin’ with Some Barbecue.

Monday, February 19, 2007

Military Justice, or the Power of Kings before the Magna Carta?

MEDIA NOTES: Navy Lawyer Discusses Hamdan, Guantanamo NPR Talk of the Nation 021507

Before this one slips away, I need to document the interview with Navy lawyer Charles Swift on Talk of the Nation. Swift was the JAG (Judge Advocate General) appointed to defend Salim Ahmed Hamdan, one of the detainees being held at Guantanamo Bay. The Hamdan case became a legal limbo compared with Alice in Wonderland, Kafka, and Catch-22 before it ended up in the U.S. Supreme Court. Ultimately, the Court ruled that the President’s suspension of the writ of habeas corpus -- based on a claim that military justice was whatever the Commander in Chief said it was at the time -- was unconstitutional.

“That’s the power of kings before the Magna Carta,” Swift said on NPR. “I believe the Supreme Court had never cognizanced the Commander in Chief with that kind of power.”

The passion of Swift’s Constitutional arguments impressed me deeply. Listen to his defense of the rule of law as the foundation of American values (at 24:00-26:40 in the NPR stream): “If we’re going to have a trial where the outcome is pre-ordained, and we can’t trust the federal courts to have a fair trial, and we can’t trust a federally-appointed judge to protect the United States’ interests and national security, do we still have our values? What happened?”

Richard Florida at WSU

Richard Florida will speak at Wright State on Thursday, March 1, at 7:00 p.m. in the Student Union. Florida is the author of The Rise of the Creative Class. He blogs at The Creativity Exchange.

Sunday, February 18, 2007

Dead Generals Need TV Pundit Gigs, Too


Gen. George Patton explains how he’d use global warming to clean up the military quagmire in the Middle East.

If that’s too much blunt speech (no pun intended), check out the Gen.’s tap-dancing in this music video: General Patton vs. X-ecutioners. “Get up, punk, and shut your can.”

Saturday, February 17, 2007

Blogger, Beware: You Get What You Pay For

I’ve been ant-crawling through the blog’s html code for the past two hours. I finally figured out why some key words (usually place names) get chopped out of the blog feed in Bloglnes. For example, if you read Hail to the Bully in Chief in Bloglines, you wouldn’t know where the cruise missiles might have been headed. I won’t give you the answer here because it would just get hacked again in the feed. When I looked at the code surrounding the word, I found that Google/Blogger inserted something like this:

st1:place st="on" Tehran

Ihad to modify the syntax so the code would appear here and not be swallowed up as another tag. This is too 2Deepgeek! Bloglines choked on it. So did I. My guess is this is some kind of tag for Google advertising. And also some kind of geo tag. Maybe if I activated AdSense you’d see an advert for the Tehran Hilton.

I read blogs in Bloglines, not on the blog page itself. When I read pages with conventional blog architecture, pages with text tumbling down one fat and one or two skinny columns, my screen-reader (ZoomText 8.1) reads across the columns. The content gets garbled. It sounds like Finnegans Wake or a teenager’s continuous partial attention. Reading blogs in a feed aggregator like Bloglines allows me to separate signal from noise because feeds usually deliver only the fat column’s content. that’s how RSS revolutionized my ability to read on the Internet.

So when I launched this blog, the first thing I did was subscribe to the feed. I’ve been very disappointed with the result. I thought I was doing something wrong. It’s the kind of problem that gives editors ulcers.

There’s a reason why this blog is designated version 1.0. Version 2.0 will be powered by a different blog platform that allows me, not Google, to control these shenanigans.

“The Mother of All Acronym Generators” Presents: O.I.L.

I know I’m getting obsessive-compulsive about the acronyms, but media bottom-feeders have to metabolize the linguistic detritus trickling down the food chain. Check out Brook Gladstone’s cameo commentary in this week’s On the Media. According to Brook, we count on “the Mother of All Acronym Generators” (a.k.a. The Pentagon) to cook up “unadorned initials for harsh realities.” The latest gem is an acronym for the security crackdown in Baghdad, Operation Impose Law. Yes, that spells O.I.L.

BONUS QUICK QUIZ: USA PATRIOT (as in the Act, PL 107-56) is an acronym for what verbiage?

BONUS QUICK QUIZ ANSWER: The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001.

Friday, February 16, 2007

Hail to the Bully in Chief




In the 24/7 news cycle, blogging about a Presidential news conference two days after the fact feels a little anachronistic, like striking flint to kindle flames to send smoke signals. When my son called me Wednesday morning to let me know the networks had gone live to the White House, I had only one sinking thought. The cruise missiles are inbound to Tehran. So the real news from the news conference was the fact that missiles hadn’t been launched… yet.

What sticks in my mind and gut isn’t the substance (what substance?) but the style of this spectacle. I keep hearing the President’s petulant, jeering tone as he taunted the White House press corps. The reporters showed some mettle, pressing Bush to explain why we should believe his intelligence about Iran after we were misled by his intelligence on Iraq. Bush deflected those questions, pushing back by singling out reporters for ridicule… while the cameras rolled. He sounded like an arrogant, condescending bully.

Is this anyway for the reputed leader of the free world to talk to fellow citizens? I felt ashamed.

I think that’s why the hectoring tone stayed with me. I need to purge it somehow, and that’s what blogs are for. If you didn’t hear it live, and you don’t have the stomach to listen to all 58 minutes of this On Point stream, just think back to some dreadful meeting in your career when you could have sold your grandmother for one executive “atta boy”. The boss from hell sets about to intimidate everyone sitting around the table by picking on one poor schnook. The boss deploys Weapons of Self-Esteem Destruction (WSEDs). Everyone else studies his/her shoelaces and prays not to be picked next. That’s what the President’s news conference sounded like.

Howard Kurtz suggested that Bush had felt upstaged by House Democrats and needed a little face time with the media. It worked. Most news outlets played it straight and gave Bush the tough-guy sound bites he wanted. The only account I read that captured the oily feel of the President’s performance came from Dana Milbank.

“Bush has always supported a faith-based initiative, but his recitation of beliefs in the East Room yesterday -- he listed no fewer than 18 principles he holds to be true -- sounded less like a question-and-answer session than a reading of the Nicene Creed,” Milbank wrote. “The only thing the president did not believe in was answering the questions he was asked.”

Here’s how Milbank reported one of the more surreal exchanges:

Late in the hour-long session, he turned to White House reporter Mike Allen, who had just started his sixth job in a decade, joining a Capitol Hill newspaper and Web site.

"Michael, who do you work for?" Bush needled.

"Mr. President, I work for Politico.com," Allen reported.

"Pardon me? Politico.com?"

"Yes, sir -- today," Allen quipped.

"You want a moment to explain to the American people exactly what -- "

Allen did not. "Thank you for the question," he demurred.

"Quit being so evasive," Bush said.
I was embarrassed for Mike Allen, though “Thanks for the question” was a game response that got a laugh. Politico.com presents a testimonial video clip of the exchange. Bush grinned, too, but seemed annoyed when his dominance was undermined for a moment.

The scene depicts what I’m sure is deliberate stagecraft. Bush knew Allen’s name was Mike but he said “Michael” like he was scolding a little boy caught with his pants down. He used every reporter’s first name like he was best buds with each of them – like he knew their kids, their extra-marital affairs, their IRS audits. Someone like Karl Rove or Tony “Baloney” Snow probably does have files on all that stuff. But Bush doesn’t know their names until it flashes in front of him on a teleprompter.

One more beef and I’ll let it go. I’ll try.

Bush announced sententiously that he would not comment on the ’08 Presidential campaign. "I will resist all temptation to become the Pundit in Chief." Then he chuckled at his own bon mot. He likes the (Fill in the Blank)-in-Chief moniker so much it’s becoming a fetish. Before the State of the Union Address his sycophantic speechwriters called him the Editor in Chief. Discussing the No Child Left Behind Act, he calls himself Educator in Chief. Every millionaire who ever wrote him a check calls him Fundraiser in Chief. Those three regrettable words in the Constitution (“Commander in Chief”) now lend legitimacy to a cult of personality. Listening to its display on Wednesday, I’d say it isn’t a healthy personality. Count how many times the President said “I” instead of “we.” Then add one more honorific title to his swelling bubble at the top of the organization chart. Narcissist in Chief.

Thursday, February 15, 2007

“Je T’Aime” Encore


After I found the YouTube clip of Je T’Aime, I realized the video featured Jane Birkin, not Bardot. Perusing the song’s Wikipedia page, I learned that BB judged her version to be too scandalous to release in the 60s. Go figure. So Jane is heard panting along with Serge Gainsbourg in the YouTube clip. Their 1969 version was a #1 hit across Europe, perhaps because the Vatican and BBC banned it. Nonetheless, the best account of the song’s history is a BBC H2g2 Guide. Sample insight: “The sound of the first few bars, surely the Wurlitzer organ's most erotic moment, made their mark on the musical landscape and will long be associated with the free sexuality of the sixties and seventies.” Yeah. Go, Wurlitzer. Je T’aime!

"My Funny Valentine" Encore

As the song goes, “Stay – make every day Valentine’s Day.” I’m not ready to let it go yet. I didn’t want to be so geeky that I sent a Valentine with footnotes (although that’s what 2Deepgeek is all about). So here are my glosses on yesterday’s post.

Wikipedia has entries for both songs, My Funny Valentine and Je T'Aime. Who knew? And of course, there are pages for Chet Baker and Brigitte Bardot.

When I watched the YouTube clip of the Tokyo concert, recorded in 1987, I couldn’t help but remember the day a year later when I heard the news about Chet’s confusing death in Amsterdam. He was sitting in the window of his hotel room. He was high. Too high. He didn’t jump. He fell. Let’s hope he was grooving on a fine May day.

This image is the Chet Baker Monument in Amsterdam, courtesy Wikipedia.

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

My Funny Valentine


This is for my {Valentine} – you know who you are. If our Feb. 14 soundtrack began with Brigitte Bardot whispering “Je T’’Aime” how could we let it end without Chet Baker crooning “My Funny Valentine”? Listen to this YouTube clip of a haunting live rendition Chet did in Tokyo in 1987. The trumpet solo is so fine it could make you cry.

Je t’’aime!

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Everyone Needs An Uncle Bucky

Who knew? Just when you figured Bush fatigue pointed to the dynasty’s demise, like the Bourbons and Hohenzollerns before them, it turns out W. has an Uncle Bucky. That explains everything.

The L.A. Times (020907) reports:

"President Bush's uncle William H.T. 'Bucky' Bush was among directors of a defense contractor who together reaped $6 million from what federal regulators say was an illegal five-year scheme by two company executives to manipulate the timing of stock option grants, court documents show. "The youngest brother of former President George H.W. Bush, he is the second Bush family member whose name has surfaced in stock options scandals this month."

Family-Value Bonus: W. also has a youngest brother, Marvin, who was named as a defendant in a civil suit charging that he made $2.2 million on back-dated stock options.

Monday, February 12, 2007

Dizzy on Riffing, Siva on Sharing

T.S. Eliot said bad poets borrow, great poets steal. He should know.

Dizzy Gillespie said jazz musicians who copied Charlie Parker riffs couldn’t be thieves: “You can’t steal a gift. Bird gave the world his music, and if you can hear it, you can have it.” He should know, too.

The opportunity to quote Diz comes from last Thursday’s Open Source, which roamed the borderlands between artistic influence, plagiarism, sampling, and copyright infringement. The show began with novelist Jonathan Lethem, who published a provocatively plagiarized essay called “The Ecstasy of Influence” in Harper’s. Another voice in the conversation was Siva Vaidhyanathan, author Copyrights and Copywrongs, who blogs at Sivacracy. Two Siva quotes from the show:

[On open source culture] What we think of as open source is basically culture. It’s how human beings have organized themselves, communicated with each other, joined each other, forged identities, and most importantly, grooved and danced, for centuries. This is basically how people have always dealt with each other. It’s just in recent years we’ve imposed these interesting cages — legal cages, psychological cages, ethical cages — around this level of sharing.

[On copyright] Then we have, in the public discourse, a blending of anxieties about plagiarism and anxieties about copyright infringement, which are in fact two very different acts. Plagiarism is an ethical abrogation. It’s one in which you violate the norms of in interpretive community or a creative community, either a group of academics or scientists, or a group of poets or songwriters, and each of these communities has its own set of rules, as Jonathan [Lethem] explained. And when it comes right down to it, what we think of as plagiarism, the theft of ideas, is actually something that falls outside of copyright. Copyright does not protect ideas.

Sunday, February 11, 2007

Another Airport Story

Too tired tonight to go very far into this white cane story. It happened right after I cleared customs and security at Pearson International in Toronto. Never had my passport confiscated before by anyone, let alone an airport employee insisting on escorting me to the gate. I was too disoriented to stand my ground and refuse assistance. I wanted my passport back. Now I need to track down the appropriate functionary in Ontario and politely discuss anti-discrimination policy and the possibility of a lawsuit. Next time I pass through Pearson, maybe I will put away the cane and trust my dead reckoning.

Sitting at the gate, trying to simmer down, I listened to this week’s On the Media podcast and found a parallel in tactics used by the NYPD to stigmatize reporters in order to limit access to crime scenes. Check out the interviews with Newsday’s Ellis Henican and The Village Voice’s Wayne Barrett about covering Mayor Rudi Giuliani back in the day.

Saturday, February 10, 2007

RMDs (Roadside Marketing Devices): Don’t Be Scared – Be Scared

Two stories about threatening roadside devices in today’s NYT deserve a little juxtaposition. Michael R. Gordon reports on Bush administration leaks (sounds like a war-drum marketing campaign to me) about a sophisticated type of roadside bomb used by Shiite militia in Iraq. “Mounting evidence” points to Iran as the source. Richard Siklos reports that the president of the Cartoon Network, a division of the Turner Broadcasting System, has resigned over the panic created by roadside electronic devices in Boston. It’s hard to know when to be scared. It’s hard to keep the bad guys straight without a scorecard. It’s even harder to know who’s marketing what. Maybe we need a preemptive war on terror aimed at electronics. Or roads.

The confluence of these stories reminds me of a sound bite about war and sacrifice that keeps popping up in the media like a marketing slogan: “The Army goes to Baghdad. America goes to Wal-Mart.”

UPDATE 021107: First we worried about WMDs (weapons of mass destruction). Then it was IEDs (improvised explosive devices). Now there’s this new thing, the EFP (explosively formed). Let’s call the new new thing RMD (roadside marketing device).

UPDATE 021707: Columbia Journalism Review ‘s Michael Massing criticizes and Michael R. Gordon defends the Feb. 10 NYT story in the this week’s On the Media.

Friday, February 9, 2007

Hanging from a Supply Chain at 33,000 Feet

In the next breath, after advising us against the transgression of usurping the first-class lavatory, the flight attendant on the NWA flight from Detroit to Toronto launched into a sales pitch for the tasteful consumer products available for purchase using our complimentary copies of the airline in-flight magazine. A special offer was available for items ordered in the duration of the flight, but we had to hand in our orders before de-planing. It worked kind of like a travel class Tupperware party at 33,000 feet.

Call it convergence. There was a direct, personal appeal from a respected opinion leader (at least for the duration of the flight). There were supporting print materials providing the necessary actionable details. And there was a captive consumer audience who couldn’t go anywhere else or change the channel.

As soon as we were permitted to use our personal electronic devices I switched on a podcast of a Berkman Center talk by communications law professor Susan Crawford. Lo and behold, she was talking about what I had just experienced – corporate-style media convergence and conflicting notions of the Internet as either an emergent complex system or a sales-driven supply chain.

Here’s the gist of what she said:

The incumbents, Crawford’s term for the telephone and cable companies, believe the Internet is a distribution system. Think of it like a railroad moving goods from place to place or a department store offering an assortment of interesting things to buy. The price of everything is premised on scarcity. The incumbents want telecom regulation that preserves scarcity. They believe the Internet is its infrastructure. They built it (conveniently forgetting the monopolies they were given to do so). They own it. They should get to control it and reap the profits.

From the net-head point of view, the Internet is not infrastructure but process – the process of communication itself. It isn’t a hierarchy controlled from above but an agreement to communicate, an emerging complex system formed by myriad autonomous agents mixing it up and creating an abundance of new ideas.

Crawford develops an economic argument for future communication law that promotes the creation of new ideas rather than new infrastructure. Along the way she cites a seminal article by economist Paul Romer to make her case.

“There are systems everywhere. There are these two mind views all the time about how the world works, whether it’s a hierarchy with somebody paying for that department store or it’s an emergent system with autonomous agents muddling along and creating nonlinear forms of value,: Crawford concludes. “We should be leary of scarcity and infrastructure assumptions. We have good economic and social reasons to choose the creation of new ideas as our direction. The Internet teaches us how to do this; it dislocates the connection between infrastructure and application.”

So much to think about, I forgot my peeve about class privilege and separate but unequal access to airline lavatories.

After I was safely back on the ground and connected to the emergent system, not the supply chain, I read two blog posts about Susan Crawford’s talk by Berkman fellows who had a ringside seat. David Weinberger blogged it in real time and produced an impressively thorough summary. Ethan Zuckerman took a day or two to reflect and gave the ideas his own developing-nation economic spin.

Thursday, February 8, 2007

A Security Euphemism for the Republic of Fear

It’s no secret that the angst about national security is a red herring wafted to cover up a multitude of sins. It’s as old as the Republic itself. Perhaps the coinage should bear the motto “Republic of Fear.”

It’s reasonable to expect fear-mongering from the President, the Vice President, the ruling party. But is it really a legitimate reason for limiting access to toilets on a commercial jetliner? I’m not talking about the 40-mile no-pee-on-the-plane zone around Washington, D.C. That might be reasonable, too.

I heard this yesterday on a Northwest flight from Detroit to Toronto. Once the plane reached cruising altitude and passengers were free to unfasten seatbelts and use facilities, the flight attendant announced diplomatically, “To assure security by limiting movement in the forward cabin, passengers are reminded that the lavatory at the front of the plane is reserved for first-class passengers.”

It’s one more example of what Bruce Schneier calls security theater. But hey, what’s wrong with a little class privilege when it comes to keeping America safe?

Wednesday, February 7, 2007

In Transit…

Get ready, Toronto! I’m coming to town. Flying NWA via Detroit. Airports are always a cross-cultural adventure for an intrepid white-cane traveler. And a source of stories, like Bottom-Feeder, when I found myself stranded on the tarmac, alone and afoot, with nothing but the cane in the middle of a terror alert.

Adieu. More anon.

Tuesday, February 6, 2007

Remembering Billy Strayhorn's Lush Life

MEDIA NOTES: “Lush Life” - A Self-Portrait in Song, NPR 020607

Music journalist Ashley Kahn remembers Billy Strayhorn on NPR this morning. Here’s the NPR intro: “Best known as the songwriting genius who created many of Duke Ellington's masterpieces, Billy Strayhorn is the subject of a new documentary premiering Tuesday night on public television, as well as a fine companion CD. Both are titled Lush Life, after Strayhorn's most enduring composition, which commentator Ashley Kahn sees as the composer's autobiography in music form.

The radio piece is supported by an enriched web page offering five different versions of “Lush Life” (by Andy Bey, Nat King Cole, Joe Henderson, Nancy Wilson, and the composer himself) plus an essay by Kahn.

Banging the War Drum #1

MEDIA NOTES: The U.S. and Iran and the Growing Threat of War. NPR On Point 020507

My local NPR station doesn’t broadcast On Point live at 10:00 a.m. It rebroadcasts a tape at midnight, which seems like a weird way to listen to a live talk show. If I wake ‘round midnight I switch on the clock radio next to my bed and check out what I missed earlier in the day. Sometimes I fall back to sleep. Not tonight.

The topic was the growing threat of war with Iran. Tom Ashbrook said in his lead, “Some say it's a U.S. bluff. Some fear an accidental and devastating war. Some believe White House hardliners want a war with Iran, and are going for it.”

One of the guests was Sam Gardiner, a retired Air Force colonel and professor at the National War. He believes the Bushies are going for it:

It looks like a strike on a nuclear facility… the President’s red line looks like it’s being crossed… Something is going on within the National Security Council that raises a very strong red flag with me. There’s a working group in the National Security Council that’s called something like the Media Relations Group. [Its] mission… is to create outrage in the world over Iran. I don’t find any logic to creating outrage as the basis of negotiations. Outrage is the foundation for a strike… There are ads in the Washington area now on television that go over horrific things Iran has done. Somebody is encouraging think tanks to pay for commercial ads to build outrage against Iran.

“Four years ago today Colin Powell was before the U.N. making his case for evidence over WMD in Iraq and you’re suggesting something like that may be afoot right now,” Ashbrook interjected.

“The unfolding of the storyline is so much like the pre-Gulf II storyline, the hair on the back of my neck stands up,” Gardiner replied.

That’s when I got out of bed and started to blog. It’s War Drum Flash Back Time again.

Gardiner’s source on the NSC Media Relations Group was an unidentified article in the Boston Globe, maybe this one from 010207: US unit works quietly to counter Iran's sway. The article refers to the Iran Syria Policy and Operations Group, or ISOG.

Monday, February 5, 2007

Where Are You, Walter Lowenfels?

Major Jacksonan’s line about a community of readers/believers (what poets want) reminded me of a line from Walter Lowenfels’ little book, The Revolution Is To Be Human. I quote this line often enough to make it a credo:

One reader is a miracle. Two readers are a movement.

So I went looking for an Internet image of Walter Lowenfels just now and found very little about him. There is a Wikipedia page with almost nothing on it. The first Google search result points to Washington University Libraries, which provides a decent short biography along with documentation on their collection of Lowenfels papers related to the protest anthology Where is Vietnam? Bloggers make it into the top 10 Google searchs with Walter Lowenfels posts by A Burning Patience and Cosmodemonic Telegraph Company, a Henry Miller blog.

Search for Jabberwhorl Cronstadt, the fictional name Henry Miller gave to his portrait of Lowenfels in Black Spring, and the top 10 reveals a scary number of myspace pages. Maybe a punk band adopted the name. Whatever you do, don’t click on one of these links unless you’re prepared to hear some awful onomatopoeic music inspired by Jabberwhorl Cronstadt! Could there be a punk band called Edgar Varese?

Sunday, February 4, 2007

“A car, a girl, a community of believers” – Part 3

POEM: “Some Kind of Crazy” by Major Jackson, Leaving Saturn (University of Georgia Press, 2002)

When I do writing workshops I structure my responses to other writers this way. First, respond from life. Next, say what works. Then, and only then, comment on what doesn’t work. “Respond from life” means expressing a memory evoked by the writing. There’s no need to fake or embellish this memory. It’s the authenticity that counts. What a writer needs to hear to keep on going is how her/his work touches a reader’s life. All that other critique of craft is just writing workshop babble.

So here is my response from life to Major Jackson’s poem “Some Kind of Crazy.” The poem reminded me immediately of Joey Ramsey, a kid in the neighborhood where I grew up. He was a year older than me. He lived across the street and two houses down. Like Steve in Jackson’s poem, everyone knew Joe. He definitely added to the “texture of the neighborhood.” Joe could walk uninvited into half the houses on the block. He’d sit down at the kitchen table and join the conversation or start one if necessary. He was the only person, kid or adult, who could pull that off with bravura. The fact he could do that made us feel like we were a neighborhood. A community of believers. We admired Joe for that.

Joe had Downs syndrome. In the 1950s and 60s we used the euphemism “birth defect” to describe his condition. Or we said he was “retarded.” This was a socially acceptable diagnostic label and, simultaneously, a mean-hearted street-slang epithet, depending on the tone with which it was uttered. More reprehensible was the word “Mongoloid,” which conflated prejudiced misconceptions about both race and disability. Thankfully – and this may be the mercy of memoir at work – the labels dropped away when you knew him. Joe was Joe.

On our block of Penn Avenue there were other handicapped kids. Tim had cerebral palsy. Norman had a speech impediment. Mike survived a car crash that killed his girlfriend when he was a freshman in college. His head injury eclipsed a promising math education and resulted in his untimely death from a stroke several years later. Although we didn’t understand at the time, my sister and I shared a twist in our genes that evolved into our degenerative eye disease. It, too, could have been called a birth defect. That twist in the language troubled my mother deeply. My sister and I were fortunate to grow into our disabilities in the 1970s, when it was an act of political commitment, not the stigmatization of a label, to accept the identity of “person with a disability.”

That was the population of Baby Boom kids with disabilities on one neighborhood block when I was growing up. Remembering the neighborhood now reminds me that a fundamental belief in my personal disability ethic can be traced back to Joe. Disability is a common part of everyday life; there is nothing very “special” about it, despite all the euphemisms that suggest otherwise. Like Steve in Major Jackson’s poem, it takes all kinds of people, some kind of crazy, to make a community of believers.

When I was about nine years old, a new bicycle fad swept the neighborhood. The bike had a curved, banana-shaped seat with deep, U-shaped handlebars called “ape-hangers.” In a kid’s imagination the bike looked like a Harley chopper. If you scooted to the rear of the seat and pulled back on the handlebars, you could pop a wheelie as you pedaled down the street. Cashing in on the cache of a Corvette brand name, one popular bike was called The Stingray. It could be customized with a noisemaker that looked like a disk brake and sounded like the purr of a motorcycle. The coolest kids got Stingrays. Other kids chopped their old bikes with banana seats and ape-hangers. And you could always emulate the click of pistons in cylinders with a rubber band and playing card thwacking spokes on a spinning wheel.

I didn’t get a Stingray. Neither did Joe. It bothered me a lot more than it bothered him. The same insouciance that led Joe to half the kitchen tables on the block also buffered him from the slings and arrows of social status. Whenever he pumped his old fat-tire bike up Penn Avenue, he stood as he pedaled and sang out lustily. You couldn’t stop him.

One summer day Joe did something that amazed everyone who saw it. After pedaling up the hill to the top of the block, he paused for dramatic effect and surveyed the scene that fell away below him. Then he kicked off, pedaling twice to pick up speed. Coasting now, he tucked into a tight crouch and leaned left, then right, as the bike glided down the hill in long, graceful arcs. If any mothers saw the spectacle from their houses, they didn’t come out to stop him. AS he swept past me, I heard Joe making triumphal sound effects. Not the vroom, vroom, vroom of an imaginary motorcycle. He was swooshing and slishing like Jean-Claude Killy’s skis as he won the giant slalom at Grenoble.

No one on Penn Avenue ever thought of doing that before. Joe was riffing. He was riffing with what he had. He was riffing on who he was. I call it riffing on the genome.

After supper that night I pumped my own bike up the hill. As the fireflies came out, a breeze began to blow along the street. I waited till there were no cars in sight, then I launched on my giant slalom. I felt what Joe had discovered. Instead of plunging downhill in a straight line, you could stretch out and savor the glory by curving patiently from curb to curb. It wasn’t defying gravity, or submitting to it, but using it to make the ride last a little longer. I felt cool wind rush past my face. I knew it didn’t matter whether I could pop a wheelie. I was doing a Joey. That’s what the stunt became in local legend.

Joe was almost twenty the last time I saw him. He came into my mother’s kitchen, greeting her with his customary “Lou, howya doin’?” We had become coffee-drinkers by then. We loaded up the Folgers with enough sugar to leave a syrupy rime at the bottom of the cups. That’s the way our mothers did it. I don’t remember what we talked about. When we’d drained our cups, we scooped up the sugar with our fingers, licking and nodding as if to say, “It’s good. It’s all good.”

Within a year I moved away, and Joe died of a congenital heart problem. The old neighborhood was never the same.

“A car, a girl, a community of believers” – Part 2



Portrait of Major Jackson by Marion Ettinge
Source: majorjackson.com

“A car, a girl, a community of believers” – Part 1

POEM: “Some Kind of Crazy” by Major Jackson, Leaving Saturn (University of Georgia Press, 2002)

I am enchanted by this line of poetry. It wormed its way into my memory, and now and then it floats to the top of inner speech when I should be using my words to transact one or another dreary task. It’s the final line of a poem by Major Jackson. I heard him read it on an excellent edition of Open Source with Christopher Lydon on January 23.

“Some Kind of Crazy” tells a story about a street person from the Philadelphia neighborhood where Jackson grew up. As he walked around the neighborhood he pretended he was a car. “He was definitely someone who gave texture to my neighborhood,” the poet explains before reading the poem. “Everyone knew who he was. A number of the girls would ask for a ride, and he would pretend like he was parking the car and get out and act as if he was opening the passenger door for them.”

“It doesn’t matter if you can’t see/Steve’s 1985 Corvette,” the poem begins

Like a Baptist
Preacher stroking the dark underside
Of God’s wet tongue, he can make you

Believe.

The poem ends:

We, the faithful, never call
Him crazy, crackbrained, just a little
Touched. It’s all he ever wants:
A car, a girl, a community of believers.

Amen.

“That’s all any of us want, maybe. That’ll do,” Chris Lydon says in that awkward moment after a poem is recited and the silence waits for a response. “A ‘community of believers’ is interesting. That’s what a poet wants, right?”

“A community of readers,” Jackson answers, “– and believers.”

All of this – the conversational setup, the poem itself, the response – happens between 35:20 and 38:00 on the podcast. It works perfectly, poem and context. Every poem, when recited aloud, exists in an aural context. At poetry readings the nervous patter preceding a poem can be longer than the poem itself, and after the last line is uttered… few poets are brave enough to let the silence linger. And few listeners loosen their character armor enough to allow an audible response.

It’s paradoxical: more poets are writing and publishing poems today than ever before, but few poems really find an audience, a community of believers. We need to work on creating more contexts where poetry can be experienced. That’s a creative project as necessary as the work of writing poems. This edition of Open Source does the job well.

I have more to say about “Some Kind of Crazy” which I’ll pursue in subsequent posts. For now, I am grateful that hearing one poem and remembering just one of its lines has returned me like a prose-prodigal son to the visionary linguistic space of poetry.

This is just the first of many paeans to Open Source with Christopher Lydon. To my mind, it is the most intelligent conversation anywhere on radio. I get it as a podcast, the only one I listen to on a daily basis. It’s where I expect to find depth, nuance, perspective on issues like Iraq and global warming. Interspersed among the current affairs topics are gems like this show with Major Jackson which remind you that there is more to life than the daily news. Need a break? A little inspiration? Listen to Chris Lydon with Philip Roth, Daniel Barenboim, and Emerson biographer Robert D. Richardson.

Saturday, February 3, 2007

OTM on the Mainline

MEDIA NOTES: On the Media NPR 020207
There are so many good pieces in this weeks On The Media, I don’t know where to begin. Maybe I’ll start with Brook Gladstone’s story about Scooter Libby’s perjury trial. She interviews Dana Milbank, who reports on Washington political theater for WaPoBrook’s #3 reason for caring about Scooter’s trial: “It gives news junkies the chance to mainline some high-octane gossip.” Yeah. Pass that needle, Nina Totenberg. Listen to the rush in Nina’s voice as she recaps this weeks testimony, including these nuggets from Scooter’s notes on a strategy chat with Mary Matalin: “Tell Tim (Russert). Tim (Russert) hates Chris (Matthews)” and “Wilson’s a snake.” Dan Schor takes the high road (really, no pun intended now, he sounds like the wise man he is): the Libby trial fascinates because it reveals details of a “failed cover-up.”

Back to OTM. Crossed Wires mashes up a montage of sound bites documenting cable news hysteria as the Boston bomb story broke on Wednesday. Listen to CNN nimbly shift attention away from its parent company (Turner Broadcasting) to those “third-party” bottom-feeders Interference Media. Bob Garfield injects some snarky tidbits along the way, decrying the saturation coverage as one more “display of the media beast consuming its own tail.”

Seriously now. Great Expectorations explores the mythology of war protesters spitting on war veterans. “It’s hardly the first time we’ve heard about returning soldiers getting showered with saliva. Sociologist Jerry Lembcke says the ‘spitting myth’ is both older and more recent than you might think.”

And finally, Anonymous Sects is an interview with Vali Nasr, senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. He briefed Bush last year about the differences between Shiites and Sunnis in Iraq. Bush’s rhetoric in the State of the Union speech played up the sectarian split, but it doesn’t reflect a newfound grasp of nuance, according to Nasr. Instead, it signals the administration’s effort to shift attention away from the intractable problems of stability in Iraq to a more appealing target: Iran.

Boston Bomb Threat

So what was so scary, anyway? Thanks to Kingday (on flickr) for visualizing it.

Friday, February 2, 2007

Frog-Marching the Ad Guys to Jail



Thanks to the NYT for this shot of Peter Berdovsky and Sean Stevens, the alleged perps responsible for the Boston bomb scare on Wednesday. Police probably need to lean more on account execs at the apex of the advertising food chain. Honestly, though, whatever empathy I might have had for bottom-feeders vanished when I heard the cheesy press conference Berdovsky and Stevens gave yesterday after release on bail. Listen on NPR. Who was their lawyer, anyway?

Maybe they'll become the Sacco and Vanzetti of viral marketing. Whether you think that’s just or unjust, wouldn’t you like to see the frog-march for spammers, telemarketers, Karl Rove, and kindred thieves in the attention economy?

Thursday, February 1, 2007

China Clamors for a Great American Folk Dance...



MEDIA NOTES: Exotic, Not Erotic: China's Latest Fitness Fad NPR 020107
The business card of China’s first pole-dancing instructor reads like a Franz Boaz ethnography: “Pole-dancing is one of the ten great folk dances of the world. It was invented by American construction workers who sang and danced witth steel tubes in their hands.”

Dick Cheney Confidential


MEDIA NOTES: Dick Cheney Confidential LeShow 012807

One of the funniest bits on LeShow veils the transparency of Vice Presidential leadership in the guise of hard-boiled Hollywood detective talk ala James Ellroy’s L.A. Confidential. Satirist Harry Shearer voices the Veep in sinister overtones echoing from the bottom of a bomb shelter (that “secure undisclosed location”), and the hack-zine-writer metaphors stretch tawdry out into ludicrous.

The January 28 edition of Dick Cheney Confidential recaps an eventful week when the Veep was assailed by both John McCain (who said W. listens too much to D.C.) and Wolf Blitzer (who asked D.C. a family-unfriendly question about his daughter). Those knee-jerk liberals better watch out or their kneecaps might get the VP ball-peen hammer treatment! You really should listen to the whole bit (this launches a RealPlayer stream from KCRW). Here are two nuggets:

JOHN McCAIN to D.C.: “Maybe you should make room in your regimen of medications for a small dose of political realism. You’re so radioactive right about now I wouldn’t be surprised if the Iranians tried to weaponize you.”

and

D.C. to WOLF BLITZER: “One thing our friend Mr. Blitzer can count on, next time I have a hunting accident, he’s not going to get the exclusive interview on it.”

Which gives me an opportunity to point you to the tableau of Dick Cheney’s hunting accident shown above. It was created by Minifig, a Lego artist in London who presents his/her oeuvre on Flickr. Brilliant, Minifig!